UPDATED: 03-20-26 14:37 PDT

stick Vermont
  
Vermont               
W-L: ( 3- 3) PR = 91.7572

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 213 A Queens ( 3- 3, 86.1) 17- 8 215 A Duke ( 6- 0, 99.9) 6-22 221 H Dartmouth ( 4- 2, 96.0) 10-15 228 H Quinnipiac ( 1- 6, 84.2) 15- 8 307 A UMass ( 7- 2, 93.0) 6- 7 314 H UMBC ( 1- 5, 88.6) 10- 5 321 A Bryant ( 2- 4, 87.8) 328 H NJIT ( 2- 5, 88.2) 404 H Princeton ( 5- 1, 97.0) 411 A Albany ( 3- 4, 92.6) 418 A UMassLowell ( 2- 5, 84.5) 425 H Binghamton ( 2- 4, 86.6)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   213 A Queens                 17- 8       9     3    +      3.56
   215 A Duke                    6-22     -16   -10           0.00
   221 H Dartmouth              10-15      -5    -2    -     -2.95
   228 H Quinnipiac             15- 8       7    10           0.00
   307 A UMass                   6- 7      -1    -3    +      2.44
   314 H UMBC                   10- 5       5     5          -0.30

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   221 H Dartmouth              10-15      -5    -2    -     -2.95

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   213 A Queens                 17- 8       9     3    +      3.56
   307 A UMass                   6- 7      -1    -3    +      2.44

Vermont Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Air Force Vermont tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Vermont
Albany Albany tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Albany
Army Army insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Army
Bellarmine Vermont   Vermont
Binghamton Vermont   Vermont
Boston Univ Boston Univ insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Boston Univ
Brown Brown tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Brown
Bryant Vermont tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Vermont
Bucknell Vermont   Vermont
Canisius Vermont tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Vermont
Cleveland St Vermont   Vermont
Colgate Vermont   Vermont
Cornell Cornell   Cornell
Dartmouth Dartmouth Dartmouth  
Delaware Vermont   Vermont
Denver Denver   Denver
Detroit Vermont   Vermont
Drexel Drexel tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Drexel
Duke Duke Duke  
Fairfield Fairfield tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Fairfield
Georgetown Georgetown   Georgetown
Hampton Vermont   Vermont
Harvard Harvard   Harvard
High Point Vermont insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Vermont
Hobart Vermont   Vermont
Hofstra Vermont tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Vermont
Holy Cross Vermont   Vermont
Iona Vermont   Vermont
Jacksonville Jacksonville tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Jacksonville
JHU JHU   JHU
Lafayette Vermont   Vermont
Le Moyne Vermont insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Vermont
Lehigh Lehigh   Lehigh
LIU Vermont tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Vermont
Loyola Loyola tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Loyola
Manhattan Vermont   Vermont
Marist Vermont   Vermont
Marquette Vermont   Vermont
Maryland Maryland   Maryland
UMass UMass UMass  
UMassLowell Vermont Vermont   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Mercer Vermont   Vermont
Mercyhurst Vermont insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Vermont
Merrimack Vermont tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Vermont
Michigan Michigan   Michigan
Monmouth Vermont   Vermont
Mt St Marys Vermont insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Vermont
Navy Navy   Navy
NJIT Vermont tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Vermont
No Carolina No Carolina   No Carolina
Notre Dame Notre Dame   Notre Dame
Ohio State Ohio State   Ohio State
Pennsylvania Pennsylvania   Pennsylvania
Penn St Penn St   Penn St
Princeton Princeton   Princeton
Providence Providence tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Providence
Queens Vermont Vermont  
Quinnipiac Vermont Vermont  
Richmond Richmond   Richmond
Rob Morris Vermont   Vermont
Rutgers Rutgers   Rutgers
Sacred Heart Sacred Heart   Sacred Heart
Siena Siena tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Siena
St Bonnies Vermont   Vermont
St Johns Vermont tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Vermont
St Josephs St Josephs tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) St Josephs
Stony Brook Vermont   Vermont
Syracuse Syracuse   Syracuse
Towson Towson tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Towson
UMBC Vermont Vermont  
Utah Utah insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Utah
Villanova Villanova   Villanova
Virginia Virginia   Virginia
VMI Vermont tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Vermont
Wagner Vermont   Vermont
Yale Yale   Yale

PowerWise = 38


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 7.14

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Queens          ( 3- 3, 86.1)    17- 8      -13.76       6.94       2.18         1.19            21.72
   0 A Duke            ( 6- 0, 99.9)     6-22       -0.00      20.71       2.18         1.19            -1.30
   0 H Dartmouth       ( 4- 2, 96.0)    10-15       -3.92      16.79      -2.18         1.19            -3.63
   0 H Quinnipiac      ( 1- 6, 84.2)    15- 8      -15.70       5.01      -2.18         1.19             6.74
   0 A UMass           ( 7- 2, 93.0)     6- 7       -6.88      13.83       2.18         1.19            -2.80
   0 H UMBC            ( 1- 5, 88.6)    10- 5      -11.27       9.44      -2.18         1.19            17.29
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        38.02

winning pts = 45.7455 losing points = -7.7250

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------